Re: [ga] Re: 2001-2002 Budget

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

The key here is that a good foundation with the interests of the internet
community as a whole did not think the attendance in line with their mission.
This should tell us all bundles about outside approval of ICANN.

Believe it or not I have a pending request with a BoD for your funding rather
than a sponsorship, I wonder which one they will pick?

Sincerely,

vint cerf wrote:

> I don't know but I've copied Stuart Lynn. I've been operating on the
> assumption that DNSO needed to be self-funded.
>
> vint
>
> At 01:07 AM 5/12/2001 +1000, Alternate Chair, GA wrote:
> >Hi Vint
> >
> >> ICANN Web site maintenance is lumped with other web work in this budget,
> >> as I read it - we'll be discussing this budget in Stockholm at the
> >> beginning of June of course.
> >
> >I'm afraid it will be very difficult for the DNSO General Assembly to take
> >part in any debate in Stockholm as neither the Chair or the Alternate Chair
> >have received any DNSO funding to attend.  My application to Salzburg
> >Seminar has also been refused.
> >
> >Would you advise whether ICANN could fund these travel expenses?
> >
> >Best regards
> >Alternate Chair
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: vint cerf <vcerf@mci.net>
> >To: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
> >Cc: Bruce James <bmj@keyname.net>; Danny Younger <webmaster@babybows.com>;
> >Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>; <ga@dnso.org>
> >Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:34 PM
> >Subject: Re: [ga] Re: 2001-2002 Budget
> >
> >
> >> ICANN Web site maintenance is lumped with other web work in this budget,
> >> as I read it - we'll be discussing this budget in Stockholm at the
> >beginning
> >> of June of course.
> >>
> >> My understanding of the timing for the at-large committee is that it is
> >> targetted to be done with its work in time for the annual meeting of
> >> ICANN in Los Angeles in November 2001.
> >>
> >> vint
> >>
> >>
> >> At 08:47 AM 5/11/2001 -0400, Michael Froomkin wrote:
> >> >what about the timing issue?  if the committee were to report in favor of
> >> >elections, will there be time to hire staff, gear up, get the money?
> >> >
> >> >Also, isn't ICANN going to do any 'maintenance' on membership - keep up
> >> >the web page, allow changes of address etc, so as not to lose whatever
> >> >momentum may exist?  Failure to do so could be very costly.
> >>
> >> --
> >> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> >> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> >> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html