ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Austerity measures



Hello Phillip,

> Thomas, thanks for the link to the archives. Doesn't this highlight the
> issue? There is vast duplication.

Well, it not so surprising that there is duplication,
considering that GA-full is GA *plus* the postings
of people temporarily banned according to the list rules.

> Looking at other DNSO stats
> the ga moderated list has 299 members
> the ga full list has 10 members all of whom are members of the ga moderated
> list.

GA: 266, GA-digest: 9, GA-full: 17

> What is being gained here? At best ga members receive each message twice.

I don't think anyone signed up for both lists. It is
a question of *choice* -- GA members choose whether
they want moderation or not (GA-full readers may want
to use their own killfilters). The vast majority has
indeed opted for the GA with list rules.

> Isn't this list the result of a supposed problem that has not happened?

The list is a result of a heated discussion regarding
a potential problem which -- at least in my view, but
maybe me being a list monitor makes me biased ;) --
has not happened and I hope will never happen.

Taking away the choice may make further discussions
about breaches of the list rules resemble the bitter
struggles before the two lists compromise was reached.

Best regards,
/// Alexander
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>