Re: [ga] Re: Travel to Stockholm

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

Dear Mr. Lovell,

We are a far more free enterprize type society here and while we have a huge
government compared to our wonderfull sister western states, our AG only does
politically correct and expedient matters.  We have really cool private attorney
general statutes and some nifty Qui Tam actions, our legal model is that if you
can pay for and sell a private attorney to move your case through the complex
legal maturations of the pre-demurrer stage it must be a good case because those
are handled on the come, Contingiency basis.  It is By far an easier and more
realistic approach than the AG - remember we got no power out here and billions of
pounds of drugs and cable cannot service industrial areas and pacbell can't dsl
with the babies.  Now of course my company has scene(sp intentional) the past and
the future and have both lawyers and alternative energy and great connectivity but
in general those of us without me, are having a hard time and bailing out. DotCom
failures hurt too.

When some one is ready to sue have them contact, the ex-jerk with connectivity to
the loving and caring legal community of So.Cal. From ownership of our blessed
ICANN to Tax issues we have the dirt and the legal liason to move the case
properly and efficiently.  (this is completely in my non- not one second humble
opinion, combined with non- legal understanding and completely without advice)

I have found freedom of voice in and through truth.

"William S. Lovell" wrote:

> Like I said, go to the California Attorney General and ask him to file
> suit.  Roelend Meyers has said he would sign and mail such a letter.
> I've cranked up my copy machine, and will print relevant emails (such
> as this one of Danny's, and (I hope) include a floppy with those also,
> and the relevant URLs for online sources listed as well. Maybe the
> Board will decide to fund its life blood then. Nothing else seems to
> work.
>
> Bill Lovell
>
> "babybows.com" wrote:
>
> > The 2001-2002 Proposed Budget sets aside for Board & Public Meetings
> > $450,000; for Other Travel & Meetings it sets aside $425,000.  Altogether
> > that amounts to $875,000 for meetings and travel expenses.  There is, of
> > course, no funding set aside for the DNSO.
> >
> > Patrick needs less than one-quarter of one percent of that amount to be able
> > to travel to Stockholm.  Our ICANN president has denied his petition for
> > funding, calling it "a matter to be pursued through process, ultimately
> > requiring Board approval."
> >
> > This would be a good time to initiate that process.  Perhaps those of you
> > more sage than I can advise how one begins a process to have DNSO activities
> > funded by the Board?
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html