Re: [ga] gTLD Constituency membership procedures

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

I am all over this like a cheap suit.  All are Welcome, and all of us should
remember that the Law and the legal documents remind us that All are Welcome!
(sometimes short is sweet)

"babybows.com" wrote:

> As members of both the Sponsored and Unsponsored Registries have been
> participating with ICANN for some time in the Budget Group advising our
> ICANN president, how long must we wait before they are finally seated as
> members of the gTLD constituency?  When these new registries join the gTLD,
> will Verisign relinquish its seat on the Names Council in favor of these
> newcomers?
>
> The gTLD website indicates that, "It is anticipated that, as new gTLDs are
> added, new registries will become members of the constituency. When that
> happens, membership procedures will be developed and added to this site."
>
> I haven't noticed any membership procedures being added to the site as yet.
>
> According to comments in the Names Council teleconference, "M. Mueller asked
> if it was correct that the gTLD procedures allow for NC members allocation
> to be a function of domain name registrations thus ensuring for the
> immediate future, a seat to VeriSign.   R. Cochetti declined to comment."
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc05/msg00310.html
>
> Is anyone yet prepared to comment on this subject?
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html