Re: [ga] Re: Ballot

[Bruce James <bmj@keyname.net>]

I would suggest that we leave out:  ****or the "approval in principle" ****

Now it reads:

The General Assembly of the DNSO resolves to express its support for the
immediate acknowledgement of an Individuals' Constituency by the ICANN Board
in accordance with its Bylaws.  The General Assembly of the DNSO recommends
to the ICANN Board that it place the creation of such an Individuals'
Constituency (DNSO-IC) on its agenda for a decision at the Stockholm plenary
session.

/Bruce



The motion put forward by Joop Teernstra has been worded as a ballot:


The General Assembly of the DNSO resolves to express its support for the
immediate acknowledgement of an Individuals' Constituency by the ICANN Board
in accordance with its Bylaws.  The General Assembly of the DNSO recommends
to the ICANN Board that it place either the creation of such an Individuals'
Constituency or the "approval in principle" on its agenda for a decision at
the Stockholm plenary session.

Agree/Disagree





--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html