<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: Ballot
Thank you for this. I was not sure what the requirements were from the BoD.
/Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales" <vany@sdnp.org.pa>
To: "GA" <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: May 19, 2001 09:54
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Ballot
Hi Ken:
We have being discussed for sometime about what the By-Laws says and the
interpretation that everyone gives to them.
Some says that a constituency has to be self organized first (with
charter, etc) in order to
be created, I say based on from what I read in the By-Laws that a
constituency
first is created, then self-organized with charter,etc (by one or
different groups) and then ICANN Board recognizes the group they think
will represent better the constituency.
However, at the end, I haven't heard anyone from the ICANN Board and/or
ICANN Board staff stating or clarifying things.
Should the NC request a clarification on the Board about this issue maybe?
Best Regards
Vany
:-)
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Ken Stubbs wrote:
> bruce
>
> maybe i am wrong here, but i believe that the board requires a set of
> by-laws from the proposing constituancy...
>
> that is what i am referring to and what i was asking to see..
>
> ken stubbs
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce James" <bmj@keyname.net>
> To: "Danny Younger" <webmaster@babybows.com>; "Ken Stubbs"
> <kstubbs@digitel.net>
> Cc: "GA" <ga@dnso.org>
> Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 2:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Ballot
>
>
> > Ken:
> >
> > I think your answer is here:
> >
> > http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-10mar00.htm#VI-B-3c
> >
> >
> > ARTICLE VI-B: THE DOMAIN NAME SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION
> >
> > Section 3. THE CONSTITUENCIES
> >
> > (d) Any group of individuals or entities may petition the Board for
> > recognition as a new or separate Constituency. Any such petition will be
> > posted for public comment pursuant to Article III, Section 3. The Board
> may
> > create new Constituencies in response to such a petition, or on its own
> > motion, if it determines that such action would serve the purposes of
the
> > Corporation. In the event the Board is considering acting on its own
> motion
> > it shall post a detailed explanation of why such action is necessary or
> > desirable, set a reasonable time for public comment, and not make a
final
> > decision on whether to create such new Constituency until after
reviewing
> > all comments received. Whenever the Board posts a petition or
> recommendation
> > for a new Constituency for public comment, it will notify the names
> council
> > and will consider any response to that notification prior to taking
> action.
> >
> >
> > /Bruce
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>
> > To: "Bruce James" <bmj@bmjames.com>
> > Sent: May 19, 2001 12:04
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Ballot
> >
> >
> > question ?
> >
> > are you proposing an individual constituancy with the same bylaws
proposed
> > in 1999 by joop or are you proposing a new individual constituancy with
> > different by-laws.. ?
> >
> > i believe the last proposal & related by-laws were rejected by the board
> in
> > 1999
> >
> > ken stubbs
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bruce James" <bmj@bmjames.com>
> > To: "GA" <ga@dnso.org>; "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 11:42 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Ballot
> >
> >
> > > Sure Ken, please look at this Icann site:
> > >
> > > http://www.icann.org/dnso/additionalpage.htm
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > /Bruce
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>
> > > To: "Bruce James" <bmj@keyname.net>
> > > Sent: May 19, 2001 08:49
> > > Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Ballot
> > >
> > >
> > > pleas provide me with a link to the proposed by-laws for the proposed
> > > constituancy
> > >
> > > thank you
> > >
> > > ken stubbs
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Bruce James" <bmj@keyname.net>
> > > To: "babybows.com" <webmaster@babybows.com>; <ga@dnso.org>
> > > Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 8:56 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Ballot
> > >
> > >
> > > > I would suggest that we leave out: ****or the "approval in
principle"
> > > ****
> > > >
> > > > Now it reads:
> > > >
> > > > The General Assembly of the DNSO resolves to express its support for
> the
> > > > immediate acknowledgement of an Individuals' Constituency by the
ICANN
> > > Board
> > > > in accordance with its Bylaws. The General Assembly of the DNSO
> > > recommends
> > > > to the ICANN Board that it place the creation of such an
Individuals'
> > > > Constituency (DNSO-IC) on its agenda for a decision at the Stockholm
> > > plenary
> > > > session.
> > > >
> > > > /Bruce
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The motion put forward by Joop Teernstra has been worded as a
ballot:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The General Assembly of the DNSO resolves to express its support for
> the
> > > > immediate acknowledgement of an Individuals' Constituency by the
ICANN
> > > Board
> > > > in accordance with its Bylaws. The General Assembly of the DNSO
> > > recommends
> > > > to the ICANN Board that it place either the creation of such an
> > > Individuals'
> > > > Constituency or the "approval in principle" on its agenda for a
> decision
> > > at
> > > > the Stockholm plenary session.
> > > >
> > > > Agree/Disagree
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
IT Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Tel: (507) 230-4011 ext 213
Fax: (507) 230-3455
e-mail: vany@sdnp.org.pa
http://www.sdnp.org.pa
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|