ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Re: .ORG divesture


Vany and all,

  IMHO it should be an non-profit or a Non-commercial organization
that takes over .ORG.  I also believe that the NCDNHC should sponsor
a organization that is one of it's members to submit a proposal to
take over .ORG.

Vany Martinez wrote:

> Dear fellow members:
>
> Fact:  Disvesture of .ORG will take place the next year
>
> Subjects for discussion:
>
> Process of selection of an organization (Non-Profit?) to run .ORG Registry
> Question 1:  Will the DNSO be consulted by the ICANN Board about the process?
> Question 2:  Will the ICANN Board take in count DNSO recommendations
> (regardless of ICANN Board asked for such recommendations or not?)
> Question 3:  What kind of entity will be allowed to apply to run
> .ORG:  Profit? Non-Profit? Non-Commercial (under definition of the NCDNHC
> Charter?), all of them?  Lets remember that not all Non-Profit
> organizations are Non-Commercial under our charter.  Do we want the .ORG in
> hads of an Association of Trade, for example?
> Question 4:  Same fees will be applied to apply and run .ORG than new gTLDs?
>
> Policy that will rule .ORG
> Question 5.  Will the RFC1591 for .ORG will change or remain equal?
> Question 6.  If it will change, does domain names holders under .ORG that
> registered their domain names before such change and are not necesarily in
> compliance with the new rules will keep their domains or do they have to
> surrender them?
> Question 7.  If domain names holders have to surrender domain names...do
> they have to do it inmediatly or there will be a moratory (ie. the end of
> the period for where they payed?).  If they have to do it inmediatly:  will
> they receive monetary compensation or the change to register at no cost for
> them the first one or two years in any other  suitable gTLD?
> Question 8.  Decision about changing policy for .ORG or remain it the same
> as in RFC1591 will be consulted with DNSO?
> Question 9:  Will the ICANN Board take in count recommendations done by
> DNSO in this subject (regardless if ICANN Board asked for them or not?)
>
> Well...I think here there are enough material to begin the
> discussion.   Also, my opinion is that I would like someone with more
> knowledge on this subject makes a presentation about it in NCDNHC meeting
> in Stockholm.   What do you think?
>
> Best Regards
> Vany
>
> Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
> IT Specialist
> Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
> a member of the Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency of the
> ICANN's DNSO
> e-mail:  vany@sdnp.org.pa
> Tel: (507) 230-4011 ext 213
> Fax:  (507)  230-3455
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as: Jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1799I@lyris.isoc.org

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>