Re: [ga] Amended Ballot

[Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>]

Although I do support the motion for a IDNHC, I think the distinction
between suers and domain holders is quite unimportant, certainly when
looking at the near future, when DNS will be used for much more than
websites and email. I mean the whole Enum testbed/plans. Everyone will
have one or more domains then.

The great advantage I see in setting up an influential IDNHC within
the ICANN framework, is that the voting registry is already there in
the form of whois. 

On Sun, 20 May 2001, at 14:18 [=GMT-0400], L Gallegos wrote:

> I agree, Chris.  Individual DN holders and users fall into different 
> categories.  I also feel that small business falls within an IDNHC.
> 
> Leah
> 
> 
> On 20 May 2001, at 6:39, NameCritic wrote:
> 
> > Personally I disagree, but will support it if most wish to go this route.
> > To me an IC is not the same as an IDNHC. I think both should petition for
> > inclusion as seperate constituencies. One requires you own a domain name
> > and the other does not.
> > 
> > Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
> > To: "babybows.com" <webmaster@babybows.com>
> > Cc: <ga@dnso.org>; <DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org>;
> > <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 3:11 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Amended Ballot
> > 
> > 
> > > Danny and all assembly members,
> > >
> > >  Agree.
> > >
> > > babybows.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > The author of the motion, Joop Teernstra, has asked to amend his
> > > > motion. The ballot is accordingly amended.
> > > >
> > > > The General Assembly of the DNSO resolves to express its support for
> > > > the immediate acknowledgement of an Individuals' Constituency (a
> > constituency of
> > > > Individual Domain Name holders)  by the ICANN Board in accordance with
> > its
> > > > Bylaws.  The General Assembly of the DNSO recommends to the ICANN Board
> > that
> > > > it place either the creation of such an Individuals' Constituency or
> > > > the "approval in principle" on its agenda for a decision at the
> > > > Stockholm plenary session.
> > > >
> > > > Agree/Disagree
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> > > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > > E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> > > Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> > > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> > >
> > 
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > 
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html