ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Fw: SMEs


You have published this on the GA list. Would you be so benevolent and kind as to provide us humble and unsophisticated folks with some URLS and maybe some link type stuff so we know what the heck you are talking about.  I like to think you and Jeffsey are working from the same camp. I guess we all must be slow to judge our moves and the ramifications which they may have.

Any time and attention would be appreciated.

I also take this time Mr. Sheppard to thank you for the attention you pay to the GA, obviously we do not always agree but the fact that you participate is fantastic.

Sincerely,

Philip Sheppard wrote:

Jefsey,I have seen your proposal for an SME constituency sent to the GA. I am surprised that as a member of the BC you have not first talked to us about this. As you know we have a special fee category for SMEs (Euro 100 instead of Euro 750). We also represent many SMEs via our trade associations. We believe the commercial objectives within the scope of DNSO competence of large and small organisations are typically the same. In what way do you believe the BC does not meet the needs of SMEs?Philip

  • Follow-Ups:
    • [ga] SMEs
      • From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
  • References:

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>