<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] mailing list abuse
Although the offense did not take place on the GA list, the attached
behavior by a GA leader is a clear abuse. It shows a fundamental lack of
concern and understanding for the principals of civil discourse.
Patrick needs some training in adult, professional behavior and ga-abuse is
the only mechanism to supply it.
d/
>X-Envelope-To: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
>From: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@corliss.net>
>To: "Adam Peake" <ajp@glocom.ac.jp>
>Cc: "[NCDNHC]" <ncdnhc-discuss@lyris.isoc.org>
>Subject: Taking the Spat Offlist
>Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 14:07:22 +1000
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:leave-ncdnhc-discuss-3651O@lyris.isoc.org>
>List-Software: Lyris Server version 3.0
>List-Subscribe: <mailto:subscribe-ncdnhc-discuss@lyris.isoc.org>
>List-Owner: <mailto:owner-ncdnhc-discuss@lyris.isoc.org>
>Reply-To: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@corliss.net>
>Sender: bounce-ncdnhc-discuss-3651@lyris.isoc.org
>X-Lyris-Message-Id:
><LYR3651-45225-2001.05.25-23.48.37--dhc#dcrocker.net@lyris.isoc.org>
>
>Adam
>
>I can't believe that your email wasn't private. It was absolutely
>guaranteed to provoke an onlist response from either or both parties. And
>then a rebuttal or counter-response.
>
>As well, your mock-pretend appearance of equal blame distorts the reality.
>There is no way in the world that you can tell me that David Crocker is not
>provoking this deliberately. Just
>look at the comment below !! It's a calculated -- but very understated --
>provocation.
>
>Meanwhile, please advise me of the list rules and your authority to enforce
>them.
>
>Regards
>Patrick Corliss
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
>To: Adam Peake <ajp@glocom.ac.jp>
>Cc: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>;
><ncdnhc-discuss@lyris.isoc.org>
>Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 1:35 PM
>Subject: Re: MOTION #1: Request for creation of IDNHC
>
>
> > At 07:43 PM 5/25/2001, Adam Peake wrote:
> > >Please take this off list - no need to share this spat to a couple of
> > >hundred people, is there?
> >
> > Indeed.
> >
> > My suggestion was:
> >
> > >A new, real group needs to form and start lobbying, both for recognition
> > >and for particular points of view. (The latter will legitimize the
>former.)
> >
> > and that should not the sort of thing that causes a spat.
> >
> > d/
> >
> >
> > ----------
> > Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
> > Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
> > tel: +1.408.246.8253; fax: +1.408.273.6464
>
>
>
>---
>You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as: dhc@dcrocker.net
>To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>leave-ncdnhc-discuss-3651O@lyris.isoc.org
----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253; fax: +1.408.273.6464
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|