ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Mailing List Abuse


Would someone else explain to Mr. Corliss what responsibilities come with
running for and excepting public office. (Whatever you want to call ICANN and
the GA is a part thereof, it is public)
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but;  The alt-chair may have to fork over
some dough to pay his own expenses, he may have to put in long hours of hard and
ungratifying hard work, he may have to withstand criticism and public scrutiny
of his actions, while he gets nothing from the job he may lose his reputation
and friends while doing it. Why do they give those fancy awards and heap huge
praise on people who undertake to do such tireless work? Why do people who do
this earn my respect to the highest degree? Why do they get to have their
picture taken with royalty and presidents?

Someone explain that he has an opportunity to stand tall and make many proud.
He also has the free will to chose the opposite

Sincerely,

Patrick Corliss wrote:

> Complaint Against William X. Walsh
> Grounds: Personal Attack, Insults and Slander
> That I abuse my position as Alternate Chair.
> "Let's not say that the process is fair, at least not with you involved in
> it."
>
> I will not attempt to defend myself against personal attacks any further.  I
> simply note that Mr Walsh has slandered me in the following post.  Mr Walsh
> is free to submit a complaint should I exceed the cross-posting limit (with
> or without the titles).
>
> With 35 posts allowed per person per day, and very many outside lists
> available for cross-posting, I would appreciate hearing from any person who
> is in favour of allowing unrestrained cross-posting across any or all lists.
>
> The list members can decide for themselves whether they wish to achieve
> anything constructive on this forum.  Meanwhile the list monitors can
> adjudicate my complaint.  Of course, I will not be involved in the process.
>
> Best regards
> Patrick Corliss
> (personal posting)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> To: Patrick Corliss <patrick@quad.net.au>
> Cc: Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>; [ga] <ga@dnso.org>
> Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 4:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [ga] Mailing List Abuse
>
> > Hello Patrick,
> >
> > Saturday, May 26, 2001, 10:17:42 PM, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> >
> > > length and free of personal attacks.  There is also a no cross-posting
> rule.
> > > This is all summarised as "respect for other participants".
> >
> > Hold it.  The "no cross-posting rule" is not in fact a no cross
> > posting "rule" but a policy setup WITHOUT CONSULTATION with this
> > assembly by the list administrator, and enforced by rules that the
> > list administrator sets up that filter out messages CC'd to particular
> > addresses.
> >
> > There is in fact no sanction-able rule on cross posting.
> >
> > > This system favours people who are suspended.  It is not unfair, quite
> the
> > > contrary.  Those who do not wish to be suspended merely need to comply
> with
> > > the simple rules outlined above.
> >
> > Except of course for you, because you feel that by putting "List
> > Admin" in your from address you can somehow exempt yourself from the
> > posting limits because the posts you send using that name are posts
> > you think are important, even though they are not related to this
> > fictional title of "List admin" you have created for yourself.
> >
> > I just want to point out that the current moderators feel there is one
> > standard for everyone else, and another for themselves.  Or more
> > directly, let me simply limit that criticism to Mr Corliss, who
> > offered to stop using the List Admin title if I would not object to
> > his posting reposts from other lists/news articles/other stuff he
> > thinks the GA should see, but without having those posts take away
> > from his posting limits (which from any other GA member would of
> > course count towards their posting limits) because he wanted those
> > counted as "official business."
> >
> > Let's not say that the process is fair, at least not with you involved
> > in it.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > William X Walsh
> > mailto:william@userfriendly.com
> > Owner, Userfriendly.com
> > Userfriendly.com Domains
> > The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>