Re: [ga] GA-FULL disfunctionment

["L Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>]

In all fairness, Jefsey, the ga-full (to which I am subscribed) was a
compromise to montoring the ga list with rules.  When the WG lists 
were set
up it was with the intention of not having all those posts to the ga main
list and allowing a series of wg's for those who wish to concentrate in
those areas.  For those who wish to receive ALL posts, it is an easy
process to subscribe to those lists and either participate or simple lurk. 
 

I would not wish to have all the posts from all lists dumped in my 
mailbox.  As a subscriber to the ga-full list, I would receive 
duplicates of all those messages when the intent is reduce the 
number.

I, personally, appreciate receiving the ga-full list so that I can 
monitor all the posts.  However, I am not inclined to ask for 
duplicates to the WG lists to which I subscribe, since if I choose to
respond to the ones where I participate, I would have no choice but to
remain subscribed to them and would still receive duplicates.

Jefsey, I would most strongly suggest you subscribe to the WG lists 
so that you will, indeed, receive all posts made to those lists while not
subjecting the rest of us to duplicates of them.

Thanks,

Leah


> On 13:56 27/05/01, Patrick Corliss said:
> >With 35 posts allowed per person per day, and very many outside lists
> >available for cross-posting, I would appreciate hearing from any person
> >who is in favour of allowing unrestrained cross-posting across any or
> >all lists.
> 
> I do.
> 
> This is why I subscribed to GA-FULL. To be sure that cross posting
> does not result into duplicates and that I get everything.
> 
> BTW I must report that the GA-FULL does not work properly, I do not
> receive all the mails I expect. On he GA lists there are two
> filterings in action: - the self imposed filtering resulting from
> posting on a sub-GA list. - the sub-list filtered posts. I fully
> understand that those who are here for fun may be hurt by some
> informations, remarks etc...  and that they need such a protection
> scheme. This is a convenience for them.
> 
> It happens that those who are here for their business are actually
> interested in these elements and that for them getting everything is not
> only a convenience but a necessity. By nature GA-FULL is to broadcast
> every post on any GA list as if none of these filterings existed. Or this
> is not a GA-FULL.
> 
> I would thank Elisabeth to see why the GA-FULL currently does not
> include sub-list mails and - according to Patrick - there is no way to
> receive filtered mails on a sub-list. And please to correct this bug.
> 
> Jefsey
> 
> --

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html