Re: [ga] Re: [ga-icann] On Bill's post about ICANN

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

Leah,

Please drink some coffee and smell some roses.  Please review the APNIC
agreement with ICANN and the proposed new RIR agreement.  What you say is true
in the should world.  Anyone doing business with your type of roots is soon to
be politically and business wise banned.  Oh sister your survival is all about
marketing and to date someone, and I do not believe it is Cerf, Touton, or Gomes
has their head in the sand. What the NameCritic writes here should be thought
about. He has put it forth in a generic gentle form. Please do not dismiss it so
lightly and place all TLDA eggs in one basket. Please review Dr. Lovell's posts
and do not be so quick to dismiss us ignorant dotcomonners.  Those clicks per
60/60/7/24/365 mean one hell of a lot. I understand you taking offense at my
earlier posts, but this here is just good thinking out loud.
You have many supporters please work with us and not against us!

Sincerely,

"love of the perceived enemy is the beginning of true growth and leads to better
tomorrow's" (ed2001)

L Gallegos wrote:

> On 27 May 2001, at 17:15, NameCritic wrote:
>
> > Hypothetical situation apllying to the approval of new TLDs.
> >
> > An organization such as the DNSO or the GA or another organization that
> > does not yet exist would first handle new TLD applications to decide their
> > marketability, potential conflicts in recognition from a non-technical
> > standpoint, usability, and end-user satisfaction, among other criteria.
> > Once approv ed by this body, it would then go to ICANN and it's SOs to
> > review the technical aspects of the introduction of the new TLD.
>
> Marketability, mnemonics and other non-technical areas should not be
> factors for inclusion  in the root.  That is a market/business model issue
> and from a global standpoint is a huge red herring.  ICANN should not
> enter into anything having to do with "market."  End user satisfaction is
> also a market/business model issue.  Why should any part of ICANN
> determine who can be in business or operate a TLD from a non-
> technical standpoint?
>
> >
> > ICANN could not refuse an approved TLD unless it would definitely threaten
> > the stability of the Internet or create some other technical problem such
> > as length, characters it contains, or other problems.
> >
> > I see this as viable. Anyone else?
> >
> > Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
> >
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html