Re: [ga] GA Credibility.

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 21:47 28/05/2001 +0000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>Roeland,
>
>>....... What it also does is demonstrate, for the ICANN, that
>>general transparency isn't ready for prime-time. It is the strongest
>>argument against the @LArge that the ICANN has. A demonstration of chaos, if
>>you will.
>
>
>Any suggestion to change this?

Yes. I have made the (bold?) suggestion in the WG that membership of the GA 
(and especially posting rights on the list) should be endorsed by a minimum 
of 5 other individual GA members.
(number of 5 is of course open to debate)
This would make each poster to the GA list a sort of "representative" with 
accompanying rights and obligations.


--Joop--
Founder of the Cyberspace Association.
Former bootstrap of the IDNO (www.idno.org)
Developer of    The Polling Booth
www.democracy.org.nz


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html