<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Country code chiefs go nuclear on ICANN
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, at 19:19 [=GMT-0400], Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
> I think the headline is a mischaracterisation. The ccTLD move has received
> support from the BC, ISPC, IPC, in a briefing they held today. I expect
> supporting statements to be made in the public meeting. Everyone I've talked
> to seems to agree that they are already doing so much work on the issues
> which are different from gTLD issues -- in essence almost operating as an
> SO.
A lot of work has been going on on the NCDNHC for years. Should they
get a couple of seats on the ICANN board too? No, the BC etc. will not
support that. What does this support mean???
Really, the ccTLds are part of the DNSO. By *definition*.
>
> Marilyn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce James [mailto:bmj@keyname.net]
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 1:30 PM
> To: GA
> Subject: [ga] Country code chiefs go nuclear on ICANN
>
>
> Country code chiefs go nuclear on ICANN:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/19395.html
>
> /Bruce
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|