Re: [ga] the NC takes the next step

["L Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>]

On 7 Jun 2001, at 7:33, DPF wrote:

> On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:07:17 -0400, you wrote:
> 
> >Regardless of the representation within a ccTLD country or region, do we
> >or anyone outside that region have a right to interfere?  
> >
> >In the end, if a country is at odds with a cctLD manager, it should be up
> >to them to work it out and not ICANN, an SO organization or any other
> >outside force.  To do anything else puts ICANN in a political policy
> >position which is completely out of line.
> 
> Eventually if no agreement can be reached someone has to make a
> decision and that is currently DOC and IANA.  There does need to be
> some redelegation mechanism IMO.

If ICANN/DoC interferes with a ccTLD, it then becomes a policy body 
that supersedes sovereignty of a nation or region.  Governments and 
their citizens often have disagreements and even civil war.  By what 
right does another government or a private corporation make decisions 
concerning interaction between other governments and their citizens?

ICANN has already overstepped its authority, IMO, with the UDRP in 
determining the fate of a domain name holder in one country who is 
challenged by a corporation in another country regardless of those 
national laws.  This is going much too far for a technical coordinating 
body.

Leah


> 
> DPF
> --
> david@farrar.com
> ICQ 29964527
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html