RE: [ga] Individuals' Constituency Task Force Member

["McMeikan, Andrew" <andrew.mcmeikan@mitswa.com.au>]

I would also support that other nominations be sought, although I can not
think of anyone better suited than Joop for this.

I think that rejection of IDNO previously is not so much aimed at Joop than
a wish that such independent positions do not get expressed.

Joop has my support, but if anyone else fits the bill then we should get
their name up as well so that the most informed and open decision can be
made.

	cya,	Andrew...

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Dassa [SMTP:dassa@dhs.org]
> Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 10:50 AM
> To:	ga@dnso.org
> Subject:	RE: [ga] Individuals' Constituency Task Force Member
> 
> |> -----Original Message-----
> |> From: owner-ga-full@dnso.org On Behalf Of Danny Younger
> |> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 10:09 AM
> |> To: ga@dnso.org
> |> Subject: [ga] Individuals' Constituency Task Force Member
> 
> <snip>
> |> I consider to be fitting that the author of the motion for an
> Individuals'
> |> Constituency, Joop Teenstra, be chosen by the membership to join in the
> NC's
> |> efforts.  Joop has long been acknowledged as the bootstrap for the
> |> individuals' movement, and I can think of no one more passionately
> devoted
> |> to this cause or better suited to take on this responsibility.
> |>
> |> Are we agreed?
> 
> Although I have no disagreement with Joop filling this role, I feel it
> necessary to point out some potential problems with the appointment.
> 
> First I would think a call for nominations for the position would be in
> order and then a vote by the GA to select the member the assembly thinks
> would be best suited.  If the GA is agreeable to the Chair specifying the
> appointment, I have no objection but will point out it may give reason for
> others in future to state a rejection of the choice.
> 
> Second, Joop, as you mention has been predominate in the attempts to
> instigate an Individuals Constituency.  He has made petition to the ICANN
> Board in his endevours.   For reasons of their own, the Board has not
> looked favourably on the submissions made by Joop and it appears that he
> is
> not held in favour with that forum.  This may cause his participation in
> the process to taint, in the Board's eyes, the outcomes.  I say this not
> to
> belittle Joops achievements or to cast aspirations against him, but to
> highlight the fact he appears to have generated some disfavour in certain
> quarters.
> 
> In the eyes of the GA, his potential contributions may outweigh the
> disadvantages.
> 
> Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html