ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Re: [ga-review] Proposal to Merge the Business and Intellectual Property Constituency

  • To: ga@dnso.org
  • Subject: [ga] Re: [ga-review] Proposal to Merge the Business and Intellectual Property Constituency
  • From: Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
  • Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 02:24:21 +0200
  • In-Reply-To: <ulh2itck1ahhtoke4hko74urv8l556bs7s@4ax.com>
  • References: <NDBBJHDDILJHEHGGGCCEIEAGCNAA.webmaster@babybows.com><NDBBJHDDILJHEHGGGCCEIEAGCNAA.webmaster@babybows.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org

Dear DPF,
it only shows the BC is not fulfilling its mission. Not that it has no mission.
As an SME and a sall TM owner I don't see my interests represented by
anyt of them two. You may rememebr that Philip Shepard publicly asked
me on this list broadcasting a mail he has sent me privafely. This makes
two responses: I did not have even an ACK.
My position is simple: BC and IP should at least be be populated by 50%
real people; true TM owners and true business owner/CEOs. Not by
lawyers and employees.
Jefsey
.




On 23:44 08/06/01, DPF said:
>On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:41:49 -0400, you wrote:
>
> >The history of the DNSO is replete with joint communiqués issued by the
> >Business and Intellectual Property Constituency:
> >
> >1. BC-IPC Safeguards Precis (Sept.2000)
> >2. Minimum safeguards for the introduction of new TLDs - a joint statement
> >from the Business and Intellectual Property Constituencies (Sept. 2000)
> >
> >The Business Constituency website routinely posts remarks from the
> >Intellectual Property Constituency such as, "IP Constituency Statement on
> >Proposed ICANN/VeriSign Agreement".
> >
> >It is clear to even the most casual observer that the affinity between these
> >two groups is such that we are essentially looking at two sides of the same
> >coin.  A merger of these two constituencies would seem to be indicated.
>
>I must admit I can see almost no difference between them.  I was
>surprised to see on the WIPO site a submission from one of the BC reps
>on the Names Council in his role as Chair of the European Trademark
>Association (or similar).
>
>DPF
>--
>david@farrar.com
>ICQ 29964527
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga-review@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga-review" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>