RE: [ga] GA-REVIEW & Other Mailing Lists

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

For what it is worth, I am having trouble keeping the various list straight
too, and haven't found the time to subscribe in all I probably am interested
in.  A smaller number would be helpful to me.  

Organizing logically is a good idea; but keeping it small enough in numbers,
since most of us are on a lot of other lists too [:-)], would be helpful.
Not a problem to reorder this, I would think, if enough of the members of GA
agree,. 

Folks, just a little plea here..... can we avoid being unnecessarily
critical about any need to refine or change?  I'd prefer that being critical
of each other not become our most time-consuming work item.  That just clogs
up the communications even more.  

Regards,

-----Original Message-----
From: William X. Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 3:14 AM
To: Patrick Corliss
Cc: Cindy Merry; [ga]
Subject: Re: [ga] GA-REVIEW & Other Mailing Lists


Hello Patrick,

Saturday, June 09, 2001, 11:02:30 PM, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> Personally I think seven sublists is too many.  I would value input from
the
> list members in relation to how the see the system working most
effectively.

Eliminate the sublists.  They were a bad idea from day one.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh
mailto:william@userfriendly.com
Owner, Userfriendly.com
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html