RE: [ga] Blending Top-down and Bottoms-up

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

Let's go a bit more softly here...I think there is a way to both have the NC
do it's job and also to take consultation from the GA, from those who aren't
in constitutiences.  But not to replace the NC. And, that seems to be our
challenge. 



-----Original Message-----
From: Kent Crispin [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 9:04 PM
To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] Blending Top-down and Bottoms-up


On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 04:29:19PM -0400, Danny Younger wrote:
[...]
> It is my opinion that what is needed is a structure by which
list/committee
> efforts can be properly organized.  We have a need for Terms-of-Reference,
> for Timelines for preliminary reports and feedback, for Final Reports and
a
> vote by the entirety of the General Assembly on the work-product that has
> been put forth; we have a need for the equivalent of a Task Force or an
> ExCom to direct list activities.

That is, you want to subvert the Names Council.  The things you 
describe above are *precisely* what the NC is supposed to do.  

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html