<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] bringing the rules into the 21st century
Fine.
If you're that confident that the proposal has no merit, let's take it to a
vote, and we'll see who wins.
Defeating a motion seems a valid reason for encouraging the vote so I
fail to understand your desire to AVOID the vote.
Earl
> Hello Eric,
>
> Saturday, June 23, 2001, 9:38:58 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > GA-Rules sublists had my proposal several days ago and there has been
> > not direct opposition to it.
>
> There has been no support for it, either. Your proposal has no merit.
> The rules do not need to be modified as you say. Your assumption that
> they do is faulty.
>
> Bottom line, there has not been sufficient support for your proposal
> to warrant it being taken into consideration as a motion for the GA.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|