<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Quorum and Definition
--On 25. juni 2001 08:59 -0400 Sotiris Sotiropoulos
<sotiris@hermesnetwork.com> wrote:
> I believe it is time that this General Assembly considered a resolution
> on what constitutes a valid quorum requirement for the validity of any
> future voting. If this is not established, we can talk till the sky
> falls.
The GA in its vote on the voting rule made the following decisions:
- For a "normal" vote, a majority of the cast votes suffice.
- For a change of the rules, a 2/3 majority with a certain minimum
number of cast votes suffice.
Adopted by a majority of 56 in favour, 5 against.
> The next step is the definition of what a domain name is in fact, not in
> some nebulous or partisan legal haze. At no other time in History has a
> public resource remained undefined in terms of its estimated ontic
> significance and value for so long (not to mention its economic
> weight).
I believe that there has never been a public resource that has had a value
assigned to it by decision of a discussion body, where that decision has
had any significant effect.
The significance of a domain name comes from its use, and the use of other
domain names. We need to observe, not to assign.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|