Re[2]: [ga] UDRP Task Force Member

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Eric,

Diplomacy and professionalism in communication are traits that should
not be discounted when selecting someone to be a representative.

Friday, June 29, 2001, 7:33:51 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:

> Danny,

> I very much appreciate your position here and actually find no problem in your
> method.  Between the ten of us we can fight it out and probably end up with the
> same person and you have not excluded anyone from the process and if we are
> deadlocked we can vote through our group and that will work. This issue has been
> beaten until dead and then shot four or five times.  Overall the GA is very much
> opposed to reverse hijacking and considers the UDRP as extra judiciary and
> illigitimate which it is.  So all we have to do is find someone who supports
> that position and will take the danged job and we got it made.

> It appears that Namecritic is a front runner and that reflects our feelings but
> of course with any consensus body we will have some who just are adamant that
> someone who will not force our agenda should be the person and then they will
> attack the legitimacy from the bottom and someone from the top will use it to
> cast doubt and ignore what our dude or dudette says.  So let us do it this way.

> But really cost as a reason not to have a vote means we cannot afford to fulfill
> our function and that is the BoDs' intention.

> Sincerely,
> Eric

> DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

>> Brett,
>>
>> I am certainly prepared to be flexible on this issue... however, "elections"
>> are both costly and require a fair amount of time (as Elisabeth has
>> previously pointed out).  Perhaps if the group, (including any other
>> interested parties) discusses this issue on the UDRP list, they will arrive
>> at a suitable candidate without the need for a formal election process.  I
>> welcome any other suggestions that would lead to an expediate conclusion.
>>
>> regards,
>> Danny
>> --
>> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html