<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Some other ideas about the questions... [ga-udrp] UDRP Questionnaire
"William S. Lovell" wrote:
> <snip>I'll hate myself for this, but the way that the courts enforce uniformity
> over,
> say,
> the regional circuit courts, is that there is an appeal to the U. S. Supreme
> Court
> which then defines standards for the lower appellate courts to follow. Even
> that
> does not work too well -- some circuits (e.g., the 9th) make it a practice of
> weaseling their way around U. S. Supreme Court decisions -- they read the ones
> they want to read and ignore the rest.<snip>
Is that the infamous "Rocket Docket"? Yes, a rather slick operation that... Did
someone say something about Law???
> <snip>(And here, of course, is one of the major
> problems: I would
> wager that most of those on these panels are techie Internet gurus who don't
> know beans about
> any trademark law anywhere.)<snip>
I'll take you up on that wager Bill. How much would you like to lose?
> > >007. Should the ability to challenge a name under the UDRP expire
> > after a
> > > >single registrant has held the name for a specified period of time?
>
> Good question
An excellent question Marilyn! Milton Mueller has already proposed a 3 year
registration stipulation. I fully support Milton's initiative.
Regards,
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|