<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] GA's UDRP Task Force Representative
on 7/2/01 12:08 AM, DannyYounger@cs.com at DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> Dear Elisabeth,
>
> The Names Council has asked the General Assembly to select a candidate for
> the UDRP Task Force. Please prepare an GA-Announce message detailing the
> voting process whereby we may elect such a representative. As the Council
> has indicated that it seeks to move ahead rapidly with this Task Force,
> please keep the timeline for this process as short as is reasonably possible.
>
> PS. Self-nominations are acceptable.
>
> Thank you,
> Danny Younger
Hello Elisabeth,
What is "as short as is reasonably possible"? As you may know, we are
working on a Best Practices Initiative that seeks guidelines for known DNSO
tasks. With respect to the election of a GA representative, would you say it
is reasonable to allow 7 days for GA discussion (following receipt of
request from NC), followed by 7 days for nominations, followed by 7 days for
voting, total time needed for procedure to elect a representive, 21 days?
This would give you (aka the secretariat) 7 days notice of services required
by the GA following the initial announcement, but assumes the secretariat
can process announcements within that timeframe. Please advise.
Regards,
Joanna
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|