<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] UDRP TF member
I have studied rhetoric and formal logic extensively, there is not many
tricks a
lawyer can swing by me... In any case, there are others on this list who
have some formal training in argumentation, albeit not many.
Personally, I thrive on rigourous arguments (of which I've seen little
evidence in the GA generally -from lawyers and non). As for legal
rulings... everybody has to do their homework, lawyers included-
research skills are not limited to lawyers. With respect to
negotiating... is this supposed to be a task force or a marketplace?
Best Regards,
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
Milton Mueller wrote:
> If you don't know lawyer's tricks you will, to put it none too politely,
> get your butt sewed up in a sling by people who do. The people on
> this committee will be evaluating legal standards of procedure, legal
> rulings, and negotiating primarily with other lawyers.
>
> >>> Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com> 06/30/01 01:14PM >>>
> With all due respect Milton, I cannot agree that a law degree/background
> should be any kind of prerequisite in this instance. Seems to me that
> the surfeit of lawyers making up the various task forces, committees,
> WIPO etc. to date are the reason the UDRP is where it is...
>
> Milton Mueller wrote:
>
> > Please appoint someone from the GA who has
> > a law background as well as Internet knowledge.
> >
> > --Milton Mueller
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|