[ga] The NC does do a good job at managing the only existing consensus

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

On 21:46 05/07/01, Kent Crispin said:
>On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:09:53PM +1000, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> > And the NC, which is elected to serve,
>The NC is elected, it says in the Bylaws, to "MANAGE the consensus
>process".  The primary fault with the NC is not that it doesn't serve
>the whims of various tiny subsets of the GA -- in fact it spends
>entirely too much time and energy catering to them.  The primary fault
>of the NC is that it does a miserable job of MANAGING.

Dear Kent,
Let be honnest. The NC did a good job of managing the consensus with Plan B.
The primary fault is with the USCANN: they organized in such a way that 
consensus seem to be found only against what they do.
The NC also made a good job in managing the WG-Review: they left it only a 
few days and strangled it: what else could they do when they known from the 
very begining it would end in asking a USCANN review....
Jefsey

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html