Re: Re[4]: [ga] a quote from Lynn

["Pascal Bernhard - cube" <pbernhard@cube.de>]

Hello William,

On 11 Jul 2001, at 13:33, William X. Walsh wrote:

> It's not a distributed root, its a conflicting root.  Running your own
> local root is not a conflicting root, since it would return the proper
> answer, even for the . SOA record.   Running a root that returns
> different responses is duplication.
> 
> The root that ICANN now effectively controls was there first.  Hence
> anything that comes along afterwards is a collider.

Your argumentation is quite good, William. You are right: . is the first 
collided. And you're right, ICANN, that is the former organizations 
from which she was born, first claimed it.

Now I don't see what's the problem if other organizations set up an 
own . which is coherent to that of the ICANN and are respecting what 
the ICANN has set up.

Although I see a problem in that point, that the ICANN on her side 
obviously doesn't take the users of other organization as having the 
right to run a domain under a TLD, she doesn't manage. In the case 
of .biz, the problem is not (for me) that the ICANN claims .biz, but 
that she doesn't seem to be interested i what happens to the users 
having registered under another .biz.

For my sake, that's a clear violation of the contracts the ICANN has 
with the DoC and her role. Because this is a situation she should 
avoid and help to avoid and not create.

Just my 2 cents.

Pascal
================================
Pascal Bernhard
cube
Geschäfte werden von Menschen gemacht...
pbernhard@cube.de
http://www.cube.de
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html