[ga] Roberto reelected - to support what?

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

All the best and all my trust to Roberto.
Bravo to DPF. His positions as well as Joop's positions should be taken 
into account since Roberto said he want to represent the positions of the 
GA. It is very positive to see that the ticket is by people having said 
they only wanted to serve. Thank you to both.

Now, if the "representative approach" has won, it is interesting to see the 
distribution of the ideas.

48 Members are supporting the positions of Joop  59%
41 Members the positions of Kent 51%
37 Members the positions of Eric 46%

Joop's crusade for IDNH is therefore well supported, but not unanimous yet.
Kent is often objected but slighly more than half of the active Members 
support his analysis, but probably less his conclusions.
What is important IMHO is the 46% of Eric. All the more than some of his 
posts may have not desserved him: his "dotcommer" point of view is 
obviously not a minoritary point of view. It would be interesting to go in 
more detail to see if his supporters are the same or not as Joop. But 
obviously both Individual "constituencies" - Domain Name Holders and 
Internet Users - are a leading concern among us.
Jefsey

On 22:13 11/07/01, DPF said:
>On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 21:52:10 +0200 (MET DST), DNSO Sec wrote:
>
> >A. The final result:
> >
> >     Roberto Gaetano is elected.
>
>Well done Roberto.  An excellent result and you have my full support
>and confidence.
>
>DPF
>--
>david@farrar.com
>ICQ 29964527
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html