Re: [ga] Suspension of Dierker, Fleming, Walsh, Williams

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

Open and transparent. Who made the complaint and what were the reasons
and
other people that had an impact? Otherwise I will protest because this
is closed
and motivated.

Here is the problem unless others missed it;

Corliss and Morfin did not get banned.  Politics at their best.

Flemming is right on point, that is if Younger is!
Walsh uses a grown up tongue-- end of story.
Williams had major contributions and is ready for the GA Rep UDRP.

Who complained and who contacted the monitors within 15 days of the
decision.
That would be open and transparent.  This is not bottoms-up.

Do not respond to any of these issues and I will raise them elsewhere. 
As it
stands now the GA has no representative interest in the Stakeholders.

The USG and the DoC has been duped into believing this is a
representative body when it is in fact not.  It only represents top down
decisions and consensus, because dissent is not tolerated.

Sincerely,

Patrick Corliss wrote:

> Hi William
>
> It is appropriate to respond on the [ga] list.  However, I don't believe it
> is an issue that warrants continuing discussion.
>
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:10:58 -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
> > Doesn't matter.  Not having a reasonable limit on time frames lends
> > itself to a situation where someone annoys a monitor, and that person
> > goes back and looks for a reason to sanction.
>
> Under the current system, the List Monitors respond to complaints made.
> They do not trawl through posts looking for a reason to suspend somebody.
>
> > I was told something off list that suggested that this had occurred
> > here, that Danny had in fact told the monitors to justify suspensions.
>
> Danny made a complaint publicly.  However, the list monitors were already
> processing a number of complaints.  As you know, many of these were copied
> to the persons complained about.
>
> > However, I have a hard time believing that either Kristy or Alexander
> > would entertain such a request or direction, so I don't lend it much
> > credibility.
>
> Both Kristy and Alexander perform their duties with care and the utmost
> professionalism.  As you might be aware, there have been a large niumber of
> complaints to deal with.
>
> > The only thing that does lend some credibility to the
> > suggestion is the close proximity to the chair's postings regarding
> > these same people.
>
> Any complaint made by Danny is treated in exactly the same way as a
> complaint made by any other person.  The list monitors adjudicate based on
> the merits of the complaint and not the status of the person making it.
>
> > Best regards,
> > William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
>
> Patrick Corliss
> patrick@quad.net.au
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html