Re: [ga] MOTION - Moving Discussion Off the GA List

[Alexander Svensson <alexander@svensson.de>]

Agreed. We can only juggle with a limited number of
clubs at a time, so we should focus on substantive
issues on the main GA list -- a little bit less
distraction.

Best regards,
/// Alexander

Patrick Corliss wrote on 13.07.01, 16:18:24:
> The folowing motion has been proposed, seconded and amended.
>
> (1)    The GA list should be reserved for substantive issues relating to DNS
> policy.  All debate relating to rules, lists, protocols, procedures, etc.
> should be debated on GA-RULES.  However, subscribers to GA-RULES may
> refer issues to the full GA for a determinative ballot or follow such other
> prescribed procedures that have been adopted by the General Assembly.
>
> (2)    The list rules should be amended to include the exact wording of (1)
> above.
>
> As this motion has generated significant support, I would now ask that it
> be submitted to the DNSO Secretariat for a formal vote.
>
> Best regards
> Alternate Chair


_______________________________________________________
  ICANN Channel              http://www.icannchannel.de
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html