<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: Excess Posting Limits
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 07:08:26PM -0700, William S. Lovell wrote:
> > Sorry. First of all, none of the above are real problems -- they are
> > all just whining about inconveniences. Second, list software wouldn't
> > handle proxies, anyway. If you want to send a message to a person, and
> > have them forward it for you, that works under any scenario.
>
> Case in point: I would almost use up my limit for the day simply if I
> responded to Patrick Corliss and no one else.
Why on earth do you think that you would have to respond to every email by
Patrick Corliss, or anyone else?
> So I gather you can be put down as one who would prefer the post
> limit rules to be circumvented by artifice, rather than by the
> establishment of some recognized procedure that would allow
> a full response by someone being deluged. So be it.
No. I would rather that the posting limits not be circumvented.
--
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|