Re: [ga] Questions for the next ICANN Board Director

["William S. Lovell" <wsl@cerebalaw.com>]

I appreciate what's being said here, but how a query as to how a candidate
feels about this or that issue, the answer (if any) to which would be used as
some kind of basis for deciding whether or not to vote for that candidate,
could be anything but a political statement is quite beyond me. What's involved
here, methinks, is the loading of the question with a bunch of hype, and that,
I agree, should be avoided.

Bill Lovell

Ken Stubbs wrote:

> so far the concept of presenting questions to prospective board members has
> been a credible endeavor.
>
> the one suggestion i would make is that any question posed be just that ....
> a question and not some sort of cleverly disguised political statement ..
>
> ken stubbs
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William S. Lovell" <wsl@cerebalaw.com>
> To: <DannyYounger@cs.com>
> Cc: <ga@dnso.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 9:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [ga] Questions for the next ICANN Board Director
>
> > 1) To what extent would you seek to ensure that the "open," "bottom-up"
> >     mode of operation of ICANN, in which the participation of the General
> >     Assembly in forming recommendations and suggestions to the Board of
> >     Directors is a part, and which mode is set out in the Articles that
> govern
> >     ICANN and in the agreement with the USG, would be honored and
> >     implemented?
> >
> > Bill Lovell
> >
> > DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> >
> > > It will soon be time for the DNSO to nominate a Board Director.  If we
> seek
> > > to have a Director that has an affinity for the General Assembly, it
> might be
> > > prudent for us to begin preparing a list of questions to pose to the
> > > candidates for such office.  If each of you can pose one question, we
> could
> > > rapidly compile a list of interrogatives that reflects the concerns of
> this
> > > Assembly.   If possible, we might also arrange for a debate between the
> > > candidates in Montevideo as part of the General Assembly session... Let
> me
> > > know your thoughts, better yet, let me know your questions.
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > --
> > Any terms or acronyms above that are not familiar
> > to the reader may possibly be explained at:
> > "WHAT IS": http://whatis.techtarget.com/
> > GLOSSARY: http://www.icann.org/general/glossary.htm
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
Any terms or acronyms above that are not familiar
to the reader may possibly be explained at:
"WHAT IS": http://whatis.techtarget.com/
GLOSSARY: http://www.icann.org/general/glossary.htm


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html