RE: [ga] FYI: Bandwidth and Session Limits to be Deployed within the SRS

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

I don't think a registry could survive with such a small amount of 
throughput to the source.  I would think that by now NSI would be running 
with OC-12s or 48s and the smallest connection to them would be no less 
than a DS-1 for each registrar.

How sad...


At 10:37 AM 7/18/2001 +0200, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>On 16:21 17/07/01, Peter de Blanc said:
>>Does this mean that the VeriSign-NetSol link will also be limited to 250
>>connections and 256 K ?
>>Peter de Blanc
>
>Additional question: when the same group owns several accredited Registrars.
>Is "crossbandwidthing" controlled?
>Jefsey
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org] On Behalf Of
>>Alexander Svensson
>>Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 5:25 AM
>>To: ga@dnso.org
>>Subject: [ga] FYI: Bandwidth and Session Limits to be Deployed within
>>the SRS
>>
>>"VeriSign Registry proposed that, as an interim measure, it would place
>>a uniform limit of 250 simultaneous connections and 256k bandwidth
>>applied to each accredited registrar."
>>
>>http://www.icann.org/announcements/icann-pr16jul01.htm
>>
>>ICANN Advisory
>>Equitable Allocation of Shared Registration System Resources
>>
>>(
>>
>>--
>>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html