Re: [ga] Re: Observations from the Peanut Gallery

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

These rules for voting were not used in establishing the monitors or the
implementation of suspensions.
So why are those rules changes valid Danny? If you cannot do it now what allowed
the chair to do it earlier?  It would appear the chair picks when to hide behind
or enforce the rules?

Sincerely,
Eric

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Sotiris has asked for a response regarding the necessary margin of victory
> needed to pass the motion put forth by Patrick Corliss.  Our rules state:
> "In the case where the question is a new rule or rule change for the GA, the
> number of votes in favour of the winning alternative must be at least 2/3 of
> cast votes, with a minimum number of cast votes being the lower of 20% of the
> registered voters or 100 votes."
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-voting-rules.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html