Re: [ga] Consensus

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Joe and all assembly members,

  I agree that any set of rules cannot be legitimately changed via fiat
and be considered legitimate, unless the majority of participants
decide to abide by those newly imposed rules.  The problem here
is that the current rules are illegitimate as everyone here knows.
So, this should or must be corrected if the GA is to remain
a legitimate assembly, and move forward with the work that
needs to be done by the GA members...

Joe Kelsey wrote:

> Joop Teernstra writes:
>  > The IETF model clearly ranks "vehemence" of opposition  in the same
>  > category as "dominance" by way of volume. (=without consequence)
>  > In other words: Persuade, don't bully.
>
> You can deliberately misconstrue my words all day.  The point is that
> everyone seems to be ignoring the fact that any attempt by the "chairs"
> or anyone else to move a germain topic of discussion off the GA list is
> patently against the current rules.
>
> First, change the current rules using the current process.  Then you
> have a new process and new rules.  You cannot change the current rules
> by fiat.
>
> /Joe
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html