ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Letter from ICANN to New.net


Dear Mr. Meyer,

I am sorry but it would appear that you are describing what Harald A. tried to
do with the GA.  Are you suggesting that someone accomplished this at the IETF
and if so who? And why?  I observe the IETF anonymously because it is such a
scary place.  I have never observed any openness and transparency there in the
last year, but I just assumed it was a private club.  Certainly they do not
allow any of "those types" in do they?

Bigotry and intolerance is a waste of the Human Spirit, and you can quote me on
that!

Sincerely,
Eric

Roeland Meyer wrote:

> <snip>
>
> That is because those holding that position are not allowed to speak there
> or are actively attacked, with ad hominems, when they do.
>
> > I don't want to underestimate the importance of the different
> > political POVs on the multiple roots, but since this issue has negligible
> > support (if any at all) in the Protocol community, and specifically at the
>
> > IETF, ICANN should not do anything else than dismiss it.
>
> Let's see; Hold a meeting on a subject, beat off opposing views with clubs,
> lock the doors, then declare that there are no opposing views...nice and
> open. This is typical IETF procedure and what you report here appears no
> different. Multiple root concepts have been actively suppressed,
> politically, almost since the very start of the IETF.
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>