Re: [ga] Domain names as observed (was Tucows Response to Cochet tiTransfer Letter)

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

Dassa,

This is a fundamental, flaw, we the GA get to declare what it is, the courts
only enforce it.  It is a property right and make no mistake about it!

Eric


Dassa wrote:

> |> http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/167543.html
>
> Was recently touted as a source to support the claim domain names are a
> form of property and have associated rights.
>
> Unfortunately, it is doubtful if the original writer of the post to the GA
> read the article as it clearly supports the case that domain names are NOT
> property.
>
> As with most things legal, it is a murky field, we must be guided by
> precedents and all I have seen indicate domain names are not property.
> Until such time domain names are given the status of property in the
> courts, any arguments in this forum are unproductive.
>
> Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html