Re: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protection Consitituency

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

Contributors,

Nope sorry it is not the easy.  If you look back through the last few months of archives
you will find a fellow who 100% stated all he cared about was the dot commoner position,
the little guy with or without a domain name. Somehow that position picked up about 30
more points from when that fellow ran for chair, when he ran for dnso review.

Nope sorry we are gaining in strength and we accept the well made principals such as my
fine and honorable friend Sotiris Sotiropouls has made claim to.  I for one breathe
easier knowing he protects common good sense in governing the internet.  So Bill join
forces and get ahold of that tiller.

Sincerely,
Eric

Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:

> Actually Bill, it puts me in the position of ratifying the claim of the rightful
> policy making body *within* ICANN, by that I mean the DNSO and its NC, along with the
> rowdy bunch in the GA.  All of which, I think, is not so far from what the ICANN
> Bylaws and all the rest of the verbiage/claptrap <take your pick> purport anyway...
>
> If we're going to get the ship to harbour, we're going to have to navigate Bill.
> Choose your point of reference folks. ("astronaut" = starsailor Gk., was always one
> of my favourite concepts as a child.  There's a whole cybersky to choose from...)
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>                 ...dotophile
>
> "William S. Lovell" wrote:
>
> > Which puts you in the position of ratifying ICANN's claim to be
> > a policy making rather than a technical coordinating body, does
> > it not?
> >
> > Bill Lovell
> >
> > Joop Teernstra wrote:
> >
> > > At 09:43 31/07/2001 -0400, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
> > >
> > > >A rough blanket statement of the broad objectives of the Individual
> > > >Registrants
> > > >Constituency (IRC) might be as follows:
> > > >
> > > >"Mission:  To effect and ensure the recognition, representation, and input of
> > > >Individual Registrants of Domain Names as bona fide stakeholders in the Domain
> > > >Name System (DNS), through an established and direct voice in all ICANN policy
> > > >formulation bodies and functions."
> > >
> > > YES to that.
> >
> > --
> > Any terms above that are not familiar to the reader may
> > possibly be explained at:
> > "WHAT IS": http://whatis.techtarget.com/
> > GLOSSARY: http://www.icann.org/general/glossary.htm
> > Archives of posted emails on various General Assembly
> > mailing lists and other ICANN information can be found at:
> > http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html