ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protection Consitituency


Jefsey and all assembly members,

  Excellent evaluation Jefsey, as usual!  Well done!  And the twisted
saga continues....

Jefsey Morfin wrote:

> Dear Bill, Sotiris and Joop,
> Sotiris' reasoning is to navigate according to visible stars (as a seaman,
> I think the adjective important :-). OK lett see what it means.
>
> The ALSC documents lead to understand that AmerICANN wants to deal with
> Support Organizations with a contract including acknowledgment of ICP-3 (as
> Roman Christians had to adore the Emperor first) and a contribution to
> their charity, research and educational activities. The pay-vote system.
>
> Let assume that ICP 3.17 becomes technically correct, IMHO it is reasonable
> to target for a DNSO including four "constituencies":
>
> - Registrars
> - gTLD Registries
> - ccTLD
> - Registrants
>
> The Registrants Constituency could pay their due through the large
> participants granting the Individual Committee Members a free Membership
> (like DNSO/BC ask for 1000 euro per Member with a discount to 100 euro for
> SMEs).
>
> Paying registrants could be ... our IP friends. Amusing but much more
> sensible to work together rather than to oppose. This might help a common
> understanding on an UDRP replacement. When you think of it we have many
> things in common.
> Jefsey
>
> On 05:43 02/08/01, William S. Lovell said:
> >Which puts you in the position of ratifying ICANN's claim to be
> >a policy making rather than a technical coordinating body, does
> >it not?
> >
> >Bill Lovell
> >
> >Joop Teernstra wrote:
> >
> > > At 09:43 31/07/2001 -0400, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
> > >
> > > >A rough blanket statement of the broad objectives of the Individual
> > > >Registrants
> > > >Constituency (IRC) might be as follows:
> > > >
> > > >"Mission:  To effect and ensure the recognition, representation, and
> > input of
> > > >Individual Registrants of Domain Names as bona fide stakeholders in
> > the Domain
> > > >Name System (DNS), through an established and direct voice in all
> > ICANN policy
> > > >formulation bodies and functions."
> > >
> > > YES to that.
> >
> >--
> >Any terms above that are not familiar to the reader may
> >possibly be explained at:
> >"WHAT IS": http://whatis.techtarget.com/
> >GLOSSARY: http://www.icann.org/general/glossary.htm
> >Archives of posted emails on various General Assembly
> >mailing lists and other ICANN information can be found at:
> >http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
> >--
> >This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>