Re: [ga] The clock is ticking...

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

Contributors,

I first read this and I could not put my finger on why it bothered me.  So I have reread it a few more times.  It is for sure we know Mr. Gomes motivation in matters that he posts. Apparently he has trouble understanding why this would be of interest to the GA, aside from any other issue.  So he attacks the messenger and impliedly and supports the actors, without supplying any proof that this should be taken this way.

So one has to ask:

We are curious as to what your motivations would be in posting this question without providing any facts that they are not made in perfect context and what the resulting action was by the council.

Probable answer:

To hurt, our Chair's credibility and take the attention away from a very important issue.  To deflect the obvious repercussions of this matter on voting rights and manipulation of the internal structure of ICANN.

Why would he do that?

Sincerely,
Eric

"Gomes, Chuck" wrote:

Danny,I am curious as to what your motivation would be in distributing these partial comments without any context of the discussion in which they occurred or the Budget Committee's action that resulted.Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 6:40 PM
To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: [ga] The clock is ticking...

Roger Cochetti's comments to the Names Council Budget Committee list:

Excerpt:  "If we conclude that the Council intended to apply these procedures
for failures to pay 2001 and later dues, then my calculation is that three
Constituencies will lose their voting privileges on August 18 (120 daysafter
the April 18th date of the DNSO invoice to them):  the Business, the ccTLD,
and the ISP Constituencies.  [ ICANN management did not invoice the
Non-Commercial Constituency on April 19th, and does not seem to have invoiced
them until July of 2001, in which case the clock for that Constituency would
seem to have not started ticking until about three months later then the
others.]
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-budget/Arc00/msg00474.html