Re: [ga] A question regarding the NC Vote...

["William S. Lovell" <wsl@cerebalaw.com>]

Good point Danny raised, but I believe Roeland is correct.  I'm
not aware of being
a member of any "constituency," but yet I do belong to the GA. 
And while the ccTLD
may no longer be a part of the DNSO, and hence not a part of the GA,
that would not
preclude individual members of the ccTLD from continuing as active,
voting members
of the GA when wearing that hat.

Bill Lovell
 

Roeland Meyer wrote:

 Please allow a related point. Since the GA is the amalgam of all constituencies, constituency members can vote in the GA, if they are registered as members. I don't see how we can exclude ayone from the GA. In the GA, they are simply members and not ccTLD members. Is this not correct?

-----Original Message-----
From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 4:11 PM
To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: [ga] A question regarding the NC Vote...
 

Dear Philip,

Allow me to raise a point of order...

The ccTLD Constituency has already formally voted to withdraw from the DNSO.
They have also declared that "On that basis members will not contribute to
expenses for DNSO activities after 30 June 2001."

This being the case, how can we allow Oscar Alejandro Robles Garay, Elisabeth
Porteneuve and Peter de Blanc to participate in the vote to select the next
Director to represent the DNSO?

Best regards,
Danny Younger
 
 

--
Any terms above that are not familiar to the reader may
possibly be explained at:
"WHAT IS": http://whatis.techtarget.com/
GLOSSARY: http://www.icann.org/general/glossary.htm
Archives of posted emails on various General Assembly
mailing lists and other ICANN information can be found at:
http://www.dnso.org/archives.html