Re: [ga] Re: [ALSC-Forum] IcannWatch

[Derek Conant <dconant@dnsga.org>]

You don't know what you're talking about concerning this matter.  You
don't represent IcannWatch.  It appears that you have a problem with
submitting comments just to be antagonistic and nonconstructive.  You
would probably do better finding something else to do with your time. 
You appear more in the way here than anything else.

The point I was making concerning IcannWatch representatives not giving
the DNSGA credit for its story and why I believe they did not was made
clear. 

Derek Conant
DNSGA President and Chairman

William X Walsh wrote:
> 
> Friday, Friday, August 17, 2001, 9:56:40 AM, Derek Conant wrote:
> 
> > The significant matter I was pointing out is that the DNSGA wrote a
> > similar story and submitted it to IcannWatch before Michael Froomkin
> > decided to publish your story.  The DNSGA story should have been
> > published first, whereas, IcannWatch purports to be a fair reporting
> > organization and forum concerning matters related to the ICANN
> > processes.  It is not correct that such an organization give the
> > appearance of organized censorship concerning matters related to the
> > ICANN processes, as in this case.
> 
> More accurately, ICANNWatch is a private operation, which uses its
> discretion on publishing stories.  They do not, nor should they,
> publish every submission.
> 
> Your story was not really worth publishing, in my opinion, and I agree
> with their decision not to publish it.  It was very self serving, and
> not the kind of article that ICANNWatch normally accepts.
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html