ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] RE: GA/DNSO Funding Issues


On 20:55 27/08/01, Gomes, Chuck said:
>Also, it seems to me that it is really easy to spend money that someone else
>is paying.

This is very well said. Was it about ICANN?

Dear Chuck,
the issue is not about this one or this one. It is about the correction of 
the mistakes we did. This is not because we do something wrong that we must 
continue doing the same, isn't it?

What we are all trying to understand is:
- how much do pay the registrants?
- how much goes to the registrars?
- how much goes to the registries?
- how much goes to the ICANN?
according which rules for .com, .net, .org as well as for .tv, .cc, .we or 
.it, .ja, .fr etc... and for.pro, .info, .biz .museum, etc.

Then why these rules which seem rather complex? for the same task and the 
same service.
Then what can be done to improve the things.

 From then on, only, one can evaluate if this is a sound situation or not 
and if things should be changed or not.  I wish only to underline that this 
is the minimum transparency due to people in here who are paying out of 
their family money.

You, the other Registries, the Registrars present in the GA have an 
understanding and information we have not. We thank you all for sharing it.
Jefsey

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>