Re: [ga] ALSC report released

[Sandy Harris <sandy@storm.ca>]

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> 
> http://www.atlargestudy.org/draft_final.shtml

I find this disturbing:

| Based on our view of ICANN as a balance among developers, providers and users,
| we would recommend that the At-Large membership select a third of ICANN's Board.
| ...
| We see the need to elect the six At-Large Directors of ICANN's Board from six
| different regions in the world, and have suggested for discussion, a division
| we believe is appropriate. This will be a larger number than at present,
| although less than envisaged earlier. 

The currently agreed (though not implemented, thanks to "board squatters")
balance has 9 At Large and 9 other directors.

The recommendation above represents an important change, giving the special
interest groups a clear majority. Methinks it should be vigorously opposed.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html