RE: [ga] Status of the Review Task Force

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

gTLDs would like autonomy also.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: L Gallegos [mailto:jandl@jandl.com]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 4:00 PM
To: roomkin@law.miami.edu; ga@dnso.org; Roberto Gaetano
Subject: Re: [ga] Status of the Review Task Force




On 31 Aug 2001, at 16:50, Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> Leah,
> 
> >
> >It seems that the ccTLDs are forming their own organizations that
> >would actually be in a much better position to determine what is a
> >valid ccTLD.  Things do not happen by themselves, but it just
> 
> Do you *really* think that the ccTLDs would want to get into the
> trouble of doing this? For instance, the trouble of deciding if there
> should be a .ps, and who manages it. Don't you think that some of the
> ccTLDs may take a position that will reflect the interest of their
> respective governments, and that what should be a
> technical/professional coordination among ccTLDs may turn out in a
> mini-GAC?
> 

As I said, I don't know what the ccTLDs would want.  My 
comments are simply suppositions and the recognition that their 
policies may be and very likely are different from ICANN's and 
many areas.  Being friendly to ICANN and supportive in some 
areas is a liklihood, I would think.  I also believe that autonomy is 
most important for them.

> We might ask some of the ccTLD managers what they think. Peter?

Precisely.  Isn't that the idea behind their SO activity?

> 
> Anyway, by proposing to create an SO they have implicitely answered.
> Were they thinking to phase out from ICANN, they would have left
> instead of looking for a solution that will give them more influence
> on ICANN.

I believe they have left that as a possibility, but not the preferred 
action.

> 
> 
> >seems logical that cc's should take care of themselves in this
> >manner.  Entry of a new ccTLD should be up to those
> >organizations as opposed to ICANN, IMO.  ICANN should simply
> >perform the clerical entry of the information provided by the ccTLD
> >organizations.  IOW, cooperate with them.  Let ICANN handle the TLDs
> >they now control and let the ccTLDs remain autonomous.  I see no need
> >for ICANN to micromanage them or force them to comply with policies
> >that could very well go against their cultures and laws.
> >
> >Leah
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________ Get
> your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html