Re: [ga] Status of the Review Task Force

["William S. Lovell" <wsl@cerebalaw.com>]

L Gallegos wrote:

> It is interesting, indeed, that the gTLDs want autonomy and wish to be
> compared to the ccTLDs when they are different animals.  .US is the ccTLD
> and it, too, should have autonomy as the other ccTLDs should.  As a ccTLD,
> .US is almost worthless as it stands right now.  It is being handled badly,
> IMO, and will be tired up in bureaucratic red tape for who knows how long.
> Whether it will become useful for the US public remains to be seen.
>
> Leah

It is quite useful. When wearing my attorney hat, I often have to search out
data on legal, administrative, organizational, etc., matters in various states,
and so far as I have seen, every U. S. state has web sites under the .us ccTLD
and, at least in Oregon, a lot of business that used to have to be carried out
with hard copies and snail mail can now be done on line.  There's also a lot of
Federal stuff, although many agencies, such as the Patent Office, have their
own .gov sites.  Credit should be given to the .us domain operators, and to
those making good use of that ccTLD.

Bill Lovell

The URLs for Best Practices:
DNSO Citation:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/gaindex.html
(Under "Other Information Documents"; "August 2001:
Proposal for Best Practices for the DNSO GA." This
page also includes much else about the DNSO.)
Part I:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010813.GA-BestPractices.html
Part II:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010813.GA-BP-flowchart.pdf
(Access to the .pdf file requires the Adobe Acrobat Reader,
available for free down load at
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html.)
Part III:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010813.GA-BP-PartIII.html


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html