Re: [ga] Status of the Review Task Force

["William S. Lovell" <wsl@cerebalaw.com>]

L Gallegos wrote:

> On 1 Sep 2001, at 10:07, William S. Lovell wrote:
>
> >
> > It is quite useful. When wearing my attorney hat, I often have to
> > search out data on legal, administrative, organizational, etc.,
> > matters in various states, and so far as I have seen, every U. S.
> > state has web sites under the .us ccTLD and, at least in Oregon, a lot
> > of business that used to have to be carried out with hard copies and
> > snail mail can now be done on line.  There's also a lot of Federal
> > stuff, although many agencies, such as the Patent Office, have their
> > own .gov sites.  Credit should be given to the .us domain operators,
> > and to those making good use of that ccTLD.
> >
>
> There is no quarrel with those domain operators who are doing a
> good job.  The problem lies with those who are not.  Try to obtain a
> .us domain and tell me how you fare.

Dunno, Leah.  Maybe one has to be a government agency of some
kind, since that's what the .us is for, as I understand it. The intended
value to the public is not as a TLD at which to get a domain, but
rather a TLD at which one can find useful sites.

Bill

>
>
> Leah

--


The URLs for Best Practices:
DNSO Citation:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/gaindex.html
(Under "Other Information Documents"; "August 2001:
Proposal for Best Practices for the DNSO GA." This
page also includes much else about the DNSO.)
Part I:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010813.GA-BestPractices.html
Part II:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010813.GA-BP-flowchart.pdf
(Access to the .pdf file requires the Adobe Acrobat Reader,
available for free down load at
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html.)
Part III:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010813.GA-BP-PartIII.html


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html