Re[2]: [ga] Status of the Review Task Force

[William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>]

Sunday, Sunday, September 02, 2001, 9:00:11 PM, Peter de Blanc wrote:

> I concur (agree) with Elisabeth's comments here.

> Peter de Blanc

Elisabeth Porteneuve wrote:
> The ccTLDs represent Local Internet Communities, and contrary to the
> gTLD Registries, ccTLD Registries do not operate under the US law and
> jurisdiction, but under national law and jurisdiction.

But in fact, the ccTLD was delegated under an implied contract that is
subject to US Law.  So in effect, ccTLDs are, to a limited degree,
subject to US Law.

> I agree with you Chuck: the ccTLD are certainly not really very
> different from gTLD, they demand equal considerations within ICANN.

I think the ccTLDs fail to see the tremendous pressure that ICANN
was under with regard to gTLD issues.  That was the most pressing
thing before them, and was being used as a measure of their ability to
handle the job.

The reality is that ICANN didn't have much choice but to make gTLD
issues a top priority.  And as a rule, most of the ccTLDs opposed the
creation of new gTLDs, so the split between ICANN and the ccTLDs on
this issue isn't really very surprising.

But, let's get some answers from the ccTLD community.

What are these issues that the ccTLD community feels have been
neglected?  Specifics please.  In this way, the ccTLD community can
start taking an active roll in advancing awareness of those issues.

Perhaps Peter and Elisabeth could put up a web page describing some of
the ccTLD related issues that they feel ICANN should be addressing,
and then the GA, as a part of the DNSO (where those issues belong) can
begin the process of developing recommendations and recommended policy
to cover to them.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html