<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Status of the Review Task Force
|> From: John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. [mailto:john@johnberryhill.com]
|> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:12 AM
|>
|> From: "Jefsey Morfin" <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
|> > How an ICANN policy could conflict with any local law?
|>
|> Take, for example, the embargo against Iraq. Apart from the
|> UN Security
|> Council, the US government also forbids dealing with the
|> Iraqi government.
|>
|> However, Register.com is accredited by ICANN to deal with
|> anyone. Hence,
|> Register.com derives income from registration of the domain
|> name uruklink.net
|> , which is used by the Iraqi government for communications.
|>
|> Similarly, Network Solutions maintains taleban.com, on
|> behalf of an Afghan
|> fugitive in the United States who formerly operated the
|> now-closed Taleban
|> Mission to the U.N.
|>
|> Register.com and Network Solutions derive their authority to
|> do these things
|> from ICANN, and they appear to conflict with U.S. law.
It's real simple John. Someone should turn them in. If the AG decides to
prosecute, we'lll have ample clarification.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|